Maybe because you're wasting space in an otherwise quality...

Maybe because you're wasting space in an otherwise quality discussion forum with your garbage posts, the content of which is indicative of a level of intelligence akin to a 5-6 year old. You come here talking (in complete gibberish) about a $20 takeover with zero basis whatsoever, acting as if that's the best outcome for investors, and attack those who present actual reasons/evidence supporting a significantly higher valuation than that. We already know it's going to go to $20, then $30, then $50, and it'll continue higher given the fact this is still only valued at a billion dollars, which is incredibly low given what WA1 has.

If you want to be taken seriously show us the modelling you've done and the evidence/reasoning you have to support such a low valuation. At the moment though it seems that you're simply pulling a random number out of your arse without any explanation or reasoning to back it up. We've had enough numpties come and go from $1 to $17 doing the exact same thing as you are trying to do now though, hence the frustration when yet another one arrives to share their words of wisdom.