I am a holder in both WA1 and now also in SUM, but I am a WA1 long term holder and WA1 first before SUM. Both are different geologies. WA1 is a proven tier 1 niobium carbonatite, SUM is a higher risk but higher reward play of niobium pegs.
There is no comparison between carbonatite and peg style of mineralization. This is not comparing which one is better than the other one. SUM has the potential to be the next big thing but it has a lot of drilling work to prove up. WA1 has already proven itself up. Hence the valuations of $1B vs $30m.
But can we all please be civil? HC is supposed to be a forum for exchanging information, not disrespecting each other.
General discussion, page-8848
Add WA1 (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$15.73 |
Change
0.300(1.94%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.001B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $15.58 | $15.79 | $15.28 | $2.058M | 132.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 538 | $15.72 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $15.74 | 266 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.05pm 10/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WA1 (ASX) Chart |