Some back-of-the-envelope arithmetic in relation to the phosphate by-product..
Pricing: (Pure) phosphorous ~$3k/T (A$4.5k/T) vs. Niobium ~$45k/T (A$67k/T) (1/15 x).
Grade: P2O5 ~ 10% => 4% P by mass vs. ~3.2% Nb2O5 => 2% Nb by mass (2 x) (*).
So, 2/15 ~ 13% addition to gross revenue per tonne mined; assuming margins ~>50%, optimistically adds >20% to profit per tonne mined (**).
In terms of valuation, I estimated previously that CBMM minority acquisitions took place at a PE ~ 20; publicly traded phosphate cos seem to trade at PE ~ 10. Using the above estimates that phosphate extraction may add ~10% to gross revenue, ~20% to profit, so it seems reasonable to assume that the phosphate stream adds ~10% to WA1’s fair valuation.
To use explicit numbers, assuming 2% Nb, 4% P from the high grade zone, 60% recovery of each element, 0.02 * 0.6 * A$67k/T = A$800/T mined from Nb, 0.04* 0.6 * A4.5k/T = A$110/T mined from P.
Conservatively, a ~.85MTpa mine with the above yields ~ 10ktpa niobium, 20ktpa phosphorous, ~A$700m gross revenue from niobium, ~A$90m gross revenue from phosphorous, let’s say ~A$350m profit from niobium standalone and an additional ~A$70m profit with the phosphorous stream addition.
Using these rough profit numbers and the multipliers quoted above would put the niobium standalone business at ~A$7b and the phosphate add-on at ~A$700m. Discounting by 40% (= 1.14^4; 4 years @ ~14% [~beta of 2]) gives A$4b present enterprise value for the Nb business standalone with A$400m added to present value by the phosphorous by-product stream.
Any wildly incorrect assumptions here? I haven't accounted for the marginal capex, which will presumably be material at the (conservative) throughput above. Obviously the reader can rescale the arithmetic to their own more optimistic / pessimistic scenarios. At some point I would like to go through the China Molybdenum Catalao acquisition breakdown into Niobium / Phosphate streams more carefully (they split revenue, profit by segment and provide many other details in the circular here)
(*) Grade estimates from a cursory sampling of enriched assay results in recent reports; the high grade zone appears to be very rich in apatite (like Catalao, unlike Araxa?).
(**) Assuming the marginal direct costs /T associated with phosphate concentration and shipping will be fairly low; also assuming the same recovery rate for both elements - probably phosphorous recovery will be higher.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WA1
- General discussion
General discussion, page-9530
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 459 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WA1 (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$19.28 |
Change
1.400(7.83%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.182B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$17.88 | $19.58 | $17.67 | $4.057M | 214.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 296 | $19.22 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$19.28 | 484 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 296 | 19.220 |
3 | 2040 | 19.200 |
1 | 200 | 19.180 |
1 | 221 | 19.160 |
1 | 9388 | 19.040 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
19.280 | 484 | 1 |
19.300 | 1000 | 2 |
19.350 | 449 | 1 |
19.430 | 150 | 1 |
19.490 | 575 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
WA1 (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online