Thank you, Taurisk, for the correction of the translation.The...

Thank you, Taurisk, for the correction of the translation.

The final sentence of the article refers to the fact that management consistently claims the Wolfsberg mine is “fully permitted” — a statement that has already been refuted by several Austrian newspapers. It will be interesting to see how the court now rules with regard to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA); I suspect the situation is becoming increasingly precarious.

https://www.presse-nachrichten.de/2025/06/04/causa-lithiumabbau-kaernten-verhandlung-am-bundesverwaltungsgericht-offenbart-bescheidmaengel/

“In recent times, the operators have attracted attention with promotional statements asserting the existence of a fully licensed mine. As our complaint procedure alone clearly demonstrates, this cannot be accurate,” Rehm conclude