@BRProject
I don't understand why the article gets you so upset?
Yes it may be that it is not completely correctly researched, but there is also a lot of truth behind it and it also contains many things that @TechSpec00 has also posted.
When I read articles where it says "written in collaboration with European Lithium" at the bottom of the footer, are these articles more credible?
Is it more credible if the management said on page 6/7 a year ago that with the help of BMW it will get all permits within 3 months and that banks are queuing up?
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1951089/000121390023031752/ea177319-425_sizzleacq.htm
You once addressed me and wrote that you have no problem if I post internet links about European Lithium that also contain local newspaper articles, as it is always good to read both sides, the pros and cons, and get a good mix.
I would never insult users with idiot etc. just because they have a different opinion, my good manners forbid that.
The fact is at the moment the price is not at the heights that some here have wished for and predicted, the only one who was right was @TechSpec00
The way it looks at the moment, the Saudi Arabia deal will not be finalised this quarter as announced in the presentation and if things go badly the EUROA options will expire in a fortnight .... so it is legitimate to ask why?!
I wish you Happy Easter
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
