It could be anything from cycle testing to tap density, strip ratio, or even the notorious patent debates. When it comes to presenting RNU as a whole, rather than as sub-parts, we are all aware of where those trivial discussions went for our resident troll. Here’s just one reminder post:
Post #: 69888812
More to the point, what we do know is that RNU has first mover advantage. It is a Tier1 project in a Tier1 location with all regulatory approvals to start mining. It is currently in discussions with at least 5 partners for binding offtake terms and ‘other groups’ – as RNU have alluded to, whoever they might be! In other words, they have highly desirable material.
Also, natural graphite will always be needed in part because it has the properties that synthetic doesn’t have, like better thermal and electrical conductivity plus a much smaller carbon footprint, making it cost-efficient for mass production on volume. It's just a question of whether the ratio is going to be 60/40 or closer to 50/50 synthetic to natural. If its a higher ratio then pity those that have invested in tier 2 projects located in basket-case countries.
ALL IMO, DYOR, GLTA(Patient)H
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
