Can I offeran observation...The stickingpoint in the above...

Can I offeran observation...

The stickingpoint in the above discussion is going off course because either by design or organically the propositions “Cycle tests” and “this is another industry standard measurement” are ambiguous/vague in their definition and therefore the original poster is indulging in a sorties paradox which by its very nature has no answer (because of unclear boundaries to begin with). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sorites-paradox/

My questionis show me what you mean by cycle tests and what is the industry standard?

The lastpaper I could find is September 2024 stating:

“The interlaboratory comparability and reproducibility of all-solid-state battery cell cycling performance are poorly understood due to the lack of standardized set-ups and assembly parameters.” Benchmarkingthe reproducibility of all-solid-state battery cell performance | Nature Energy

And again, backin March 2024

“Despite the proposal of numerous advanced materials for batteries, there remains a notable lack of comprehensive assessment protocols that facilitate direct comparisons between laboratory-scale research and industrial trials.” https://www.nature.com/articles/s43246-024-00463-x

So any claim to X number of cycles = Y , without definition is meaningless.

I have invested in RNU for over 2 years now and I have no issue with alternative views as long as they have validity.