Sideways onthe bottom pit would be unlikely, 1 or even many m deeper might be feasible
but it lowers head.
Even the top pit would I expect to be easier to increase by making walls taller not removing and rebuilding them.
Existing walls leverage natural contours of the land to minimize costs.
TBMK either is unlikely to be cost-effective given 8hrs is pretty sweet for the duration. And making it more peak MW would mean larger or mroe turbines and no income while it was done.
Also, The water in the dams if drained would be problematic in terms of contamination from chemicals leachign out of mine walls.
Better to use one of the other 22000 candidate greenfield sites across Australia and make second one.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- General GNX News
Sideways onthe bottom pit would be unlikely, 1 or even many m...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,110 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add GNX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
26.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $367.0M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
26.5¢ | 27.0¢ | 26.5¢ | $570.5K | 2.137M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
38 | 29070836 | 26.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
27.0¢ | 19026030 | 161 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
37 | 27113594 | 0.265 |
25 | 32346995 | 0.260 |
1 | 22000 | 0.255 |
6 | 188000 | 0.250 |
1 | 5000 | 0.245 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.270 | 18982915 | 160 |
0.275 | 2633267 | 33 |
0.280 | 325968 | 12 |
0.285 | 113136 | 5 |
0.290 | 32180 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 07/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
26.8¢ |
  |
Change
0.000 ( 0.00 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
26.8¢ | 27.0¢ | 26.8¢ | 2710607 | ||
Last updated 15.57pm 07/05/2024 ? |
Featured News
GNX (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
HAR
HARANGA RESOURCES LIMITED.
Peter Batten, MD
Peter Batten
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online