I think that there should be more engagement from Cristobal, to the shareholder in an environment like this where there is still so much uncertainty. It almost there are more legal proceedings arising than we can eliminate. Both independently and nationally.
Im not saying we have to jeapoardise the non-disclosure of interested parties, but if i was the Cat, running this organisation, and i believed our long term objectives were achievable, i would be disclosing to my long term holders every single bit of information i legally could to keep them engaged. The by-product of this would be to entice new retail investment.
I can bet my furry little knackers that there is a lot more going on than we have been granted knowledge of, that we would have every low-risk right to know and i only hope that is due to nonchalance and not deceit.
Far too many crickets.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LPI
- General LPI Discussion
General LPI Discussion, page-187
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 333 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LPI (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online