Originally posted by pier1
Information is king.
From the Quarterly, straight copy and paste.
These tenements beside prospectivity were indeed earmarked for other activities and it is logical to conclude that it was included in ESIA as such.......
b) used for infrastructure for the Goulamina Project but the Company has other alternatives on which to locate infrastructure and the cost of this is within the capital cost envelope which has been announced with respect to the Goulamina Project.
Tosh. She was active and in office during the 45 day response period. Anyway, don't you think that something like this would be delegated? Hardly requires the boss to say yea or nay to an ESIA. It's not as though they are not used to processing them. Just my humble opinion, of course.