Sure. The problem is that the market tends to only digest the...

Sure. The problem is that the market tends to only digest the headline numbers. Just look at almost any peer comparison, including the work of SF2TH. It's always the headline numbers with perhaps a side note as to the differences in the assumptions. The thrust of the comparison is usually centered on the headline numbers.

I am actually guilty of this myself. All my comparative models are based on the headline numbers with DCF Rate, Product Pricing, and other assumptions documented as side notes but not used in the comparison formula. I do have a modifier for "upside" which I use if the assumptions are too conservative or out-of-date - but the majority of the market doesn't go down to this level.