Thanks for responding @sjl.
Appreciate the series/parallel 101 and conversation feedback.
Guess that backs up what's needed is what we see in practice - multiple ZBMs in an install, to provide redundancy when one is going through the required discharge cycle, as well as taking care of a typical occupancy/building's requirements as 3kW is just 60% of the mainstream competitor (outside of any discharge period).
Perhaps that is what the added research may be tackling - less discharge downtime/increased power perhaps?
AFAIK, Tesla Megapacks are now using LFP chemistry, which largely negates any fire risk advantage of the flow battery: https://reneweconomy.com.au/tesla-boosts-size-and-rating-of-megapack-battery-module-by-50-per-cent/
Should Powerwall follow, as we might expect with nickel saved for those mong range/heavy duty mobility applications (Semi/Cybertruck) well, what is the advantage of the flow battery?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RFX
- General Renewable Discussion
General Renewable Discussion, page-1855
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 308 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RFX (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
11.0¢ |
Change
0.010(10.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $29.07M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
10.0¢ | 11.0¢ | 9.8¢ | $13.01K | 128.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 49403 | 10.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
11.0¢ | 39786 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 49403 | 0.100 |
2 | 28161 | 0.098 |
2 | 55648 | 0.097 |
2 | 42916 | 0.096 |
5 | 451211 | 0.095 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.110 | 39786 | 3 |
0.115 | 545990 | 3 |
0.120 | 316725 | 6 |
0.125 | 346776 | 2 |
0.130 | 10000 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RFX (ASX) Chart |