"The ‘no’ news position is somewhat subjective because I would call the release of the information at the AGM as news or a project update as such. It’s just that perhaps people had an unhealthy expectation of what was going to be released or progressed."Elmo you are correct and this has been pointed out to the following, numourous times, to the inner core of the habitual downrampers:
@kkw@ppw
@Griff5They have a grossly inflated sense of their own entitlement to information currently restricted by WDS through a binding agreement with PCL, and their slippery attacks on the PCL BOD are becoming close to the line of being defamatory.
There are others that have joined this 'cable' but they are more useful idiots than seriously being intentionally devious.
A balanced post Elmo!
(20min delay)