Yes, it is crucial to take great care in designing the filters and mute functions, especially if the near and far offsets are being used for AVO analysis, where the low frequency noise is more prevalent, especially from head waves and shallow refractors.
https://agilescientific.com/blog/2011/9/14/g-is-for-gather.html
And for those wishing to delve into these problems more deeply:
https://www.academia.edu/70804834/Noise_in_Marine_Seismic_Data
In this shot gather you can see the direct water wave arrivals in the near offsets and the head wave arrivals in the far offsets...
There are all sorts of approaches to filtering these noise sources, including f-k, tau-p, and radon transforms, to mention the most common, but that starts getting pretty technical, so I'll leave it at that.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PCL
- General Thoughts
PCL
pancontinental energy nl
Add to My Watchlist
8.70%
!
1.1¢

General Thoughts, page-8717
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
1.1¢ |
Change
-0.001(8.70%) |
Mkt cap ! $85.43M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.1¢ | 1.1¢ | 1.1¢ | $57.00K | 5.250M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
23 | 15107773 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.1¢ | 3057189 | 5 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
22 | 14907773 | 0.010 |
18 | 9181912 | 0.009 |
18 | 4232862 | 0.008 |
6 | 2359691 | 0.007 |
6 | 11048332 | 0.006 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.011 | 3057189 | 5 |
0.012 | 3615948 | 10 |
0.013 | 3509261 | 7 |
0.014 | 2958742 | 6 |
0.015 | 1371302 | 5 |
Last trade - 15.32pm 24/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PCL (ASX) Chart |