Rather, the key point he made was that setting a quantitative, and therefor arbitrary, limit, is the wrong way to go.
Distance from population centers is, in this way, in itself, also arbitrary.
IMO, the best way is to take each EIA on its merits, and judge it on its scientific and engineering, fact-based aspects, including recognizing the opinions of industry-recognized geological and environmental experts where appropriate.
Built in to an EIA, but not as determining criteria, will be matters like distance from population, predicted radiation levels, etc.
Greenland's Mineral Resources Act, or whatever it is called, probably already defines this adequately.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Geologist scorns uranium ban bill
Rather, the key point he made was that setting a quantitative,...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 40 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
2.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $28.17M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.0¢ | 2.0¢ | 2.0¢ | $29.53K | 1.476M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 114536 | 2.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.1¢ | 352250 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 114536 | 0.020 |
4 | 1172280 | 0.019 |
2 | 1205610 | 0.018 |
1 | 1000000 | 0.017 |
1 | 625000 | 0.016 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.021 | 352250 | 1 |
0.022 | 224179 | 2 |
0.023 | 130434 | 1 |
0.024 | 856462 | 2 |
0.025 | 845212 | 7 |
Last trade - 15.49pm 03/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ETM (ASX) Chart |