geology t4p and ts

Thanks t4p, it's nice to see someone actually talking about rocks in connection with a resource company. My 10c worth ...

Such an extreme magnetic low can point to magnetite destruction, which sometimes accompanies metasomatism/alteration by ore-forming fluids. It is, however, a bit too early to talk about an epithermal deposit. Continental rifts, like that which created the Keweenanwan Province, can be active for a long time and are geologically complex. The two anomalies (ie the magnetic ultramafic and the low-magnetite whatever-it-is) are temptingly adjacent but may have formed millions of years apart. It seems to me that the ultramafic intrusion shows more evidence of structural control (by the pre-existing geology) than that does the magnetic low, which speaks against a close connection - but who knows? Hey, maybe you have platinoid deposit and a completely unassociated porphyry copper in the same paddock. Now that WOULD be dumb luck ...

As for the ultramafic: igneous cumulates can be quite consistent in terms of their internal structure and, though this is no Bushveld Complex, I'll be very surprised if holes three and four don't make you smile. I'd hold them ... if I had them.

PS - I'm going to post this on TS as well, in reply to your similar post. I hope you persist with TS (my regular site) in spite of today's strange barrage - there are many excellent folk there among the stirrers. You obviously have much experience and we would miss your opinions.