Geomagntic - Climate, page-45

You misunderstood jopo - the article was about geographic pole movement.

Your correlation is between CO2 increases and "the magnetic decliniation of the North Poles rate of Change annually."

And magnetic declination is a measure between the geographic and magnetic poles.

-------

So, if the geographic pole is moving more rapidly because of warming, then you would expect the magnetic declination would be moving more rapidly with CO2. As you've shown.

Now is that all correct? I don't know. But it just goes to show that your supposed correlations may mean something, or nothing, or the opposite of what you think they do.

They are certainly no argument against global warming by the greenhouse gas effect.