Geomagntic - Climate, page-70

  1. 10,633 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 226
    I am not sure why you continue to miss the point. So I will repeat myself, hopefully more clearly.

    You have shown what you claim is a correlation between magnetic declination rate of change and CO2/temp

    As I have already said, and as I have already once, now twice referred you back to:

    Magnetic declination is a measure between the magnetic and geographic poles
    If the geographic poles are moving about more due to climate change, as the nature article linked in the thread suggests, then the rate of change of magnetic declination is going to vary with the geographic pole changes

    In which case your change in declination's correlation with temperature change and CO2 is exactly what you would expect.

    Whether that is the case or not, I am not sure. But it is a rational theory to explain the correlation, which is totally consistent with other science related to anthropomorphic climate change.

    You personally may not want to talk about geographical pole changes, but they are core to the point you have raised.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.