I am not sure why you continue to miss the point. So I will repeat myself, hopefully more clearly.
You have shown what you claim is a correlation between magnetic declination rate of change and CO2/temp
As I have already said, and as I have already once, now twice referred you back to:
Magnetic declination is a measure between the magnetic and geographic poles
If the geographic poles are moving about more due to climate change, as the nature article linked in the thread suggests, then the rate of change of magnetic declination is going to vary with the geographic pole changes
In which case your change in declination's correlation with temperature change and CO2 is exactly what you would expect.
Whether that is the case or not, I am not sure. But it is a rational theory to explain the correlation, which is totally consistent with other science related to anthropomorphic climate change.
You personally may not want to talk about geographical pole changes, but they are core to the point you have raised.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Geomagntic - Climate
I am not sure why you continue to miss the point. So I will...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 37 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online