Sure. As you say, pretty well sums up denial. When there is a robust theory regarding greenhouse gas warming that is supported by an understood mechanism for causation of warming and 50 years of science observations, denial wanders off and says, hey look, here's a random correlation, with no causal mechanism, maybe it's that instead.
I'm all for being open minded. I suggest you publish and see where you get to. Or knock on the door of your local University physical sciences group and see if you can blow them away with you theory.
