george jones chairman's letter, page-28

bauakw,

your flying off the handle again...youre getting too emotional...

No one is saying Mangt should have or should drop hanlong.

Shareholdersa are saying SDL should have drawn a line in the sand (the SIA) and kept hanlong to deadlines.

also you dont conceed a massive drop in price and not ask anything material in return. (The deleting of no shop clause was BS )

Maybe when NDRC came back with "reasonable price comment" SDL should have said to hanlong "yes we will consider revised offer but first give us proof that you have finance" Board should never have agreed to 45c without anything solid on the table in return. Just plain crazy stuff.....