Eh, kind of completely disagree...completely. The AFR claims...

Eh, kind of completely disagree...completely. The AFR claims they were the reason ASIC took on this case. If the AFR acted in error or misled their readers in an attempt to sell papers, seems like shareholders might have a reason to be upset with them. AFR also made the $300m CA claim...stock price got destroyed following that headline. Makes sense that they've dumped coverage of the the trial to a junior staffer who doesn't know what she's walking into...and we have silence after the first 4 days. I'm sure a few AFR fans will come back on me here...well, at the end of the day, there's a reason the AFR is free and The Australian is not. Then again, the AFR is owned by an entertainment company...are you not entertained?!