In case YouTube deletes the above video, you can view it from...

  1. 1sharetrader1
    10,357 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2052
    clock Created with Sketch.
    16/06/21
    11:36
    Post #: 53870489
    In case YouTube deletes the above video, you can view it from Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gN7DeGRiZiFR/ .
    Here is the Table of Contents of the aforementioned America’s Frontline Doctors White Paper On Experimental Vaccines For COVID-19 along with some highlights from its 34-page contents:

    Highlights [emphasis added]:
    This document represents the preliminary findings of an investigation conducted by the member-physicians of America’s Frontline Doctors.
    We are recommending caution for patients and policy makers and employers.     Additional transparency and more research are needed before we ask Americans to embark on the largest experimental medical program in US history. The unknowns must be addressed through a scientifically rigorous process.
    Mandates for experimental medical therapies are neither permissible nor advisable. Ordinary Americans should not be compelled to sign up for a “vaccine passport” or similar mandate just to travel on an airplane or see a concert with friends. The potential for third-party abuse of private health information and real medical risk to individuals remains much too high. Concentrations of private power pose a threat to privacy and other civil liberties and policy makers must proceed with caution.
    from the Frequently Asked Questions section:
    Is AFLDS suggesting that the COVID vaccine is unsafe?
    No.     We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication. In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease, the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened. More studies of the vaccine’s safety and efficacy should be conducted and published, and more transparency about possible risks provided to the public before Americans enter the largest experimental medication program in our history.
    from the II. COVID-19 Medical Myths: Low Infection Fatality Ratio (IFR) section:
    The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19 is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:
    • COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile
    • COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children
    • COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable

    Let the reader note that the source of these figures is none other than the United States CDC (Center for Disease Control).
    from the III. COVID-19 Experimental Vaccines Trials section:
    Vaccines against COVID-19 are now being approved for experimental use. This will be the shortest time scientists have ever been able to develop a new vaccination for a major disease. It not only typically takes years to create a new vaccination, but very often, despite the best efforts of scientists, a successful vaccine proves impossible. For example, scientists (including Dr. Fauci) tried to create an HIV vaccine for more than forty years.
    The technology used for the first COVID-19 vaccinations being brought to market by Pfizer and Moderna uses an “mRNA” or “messenger RNA” technique. The COVID-19 virus is an RNA virus, meaning that the viral genetic code is carried in the virus’ ribonucleic acid or RNA. The messenger RNA is the instruction manual that cells use to manufacture proteins. The mRNA vaccine instructs human cells to manufacture a specific COVID-like protein. This protein, once formed, then stimulates our immune system to produce an antibody to fight against this COVID-19-like protein. The hope is that the antibody would be ready to attack the real virus should it be encountered “in the wild.”
    This is the first time that an mRNA mechanism is being used in a vaccination. For the most part, mRNA technology is used in cancer therapy. It has had some success in producing various proteins to attack and disrupt certain cancer cells. Most of the commentary so far suggests that it may not be too much of a leap to use this approach in a vaccination therapy.
    The AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination uses a different mechanism. It takes an adenovirus that has been modified to include genetic material from the SARS-CoV-2 virus so that it introduces the immune system to the spike protein of the COVID-19 virus.
    The three SARS-CoV-2 vaccines nearest to FDA public distribution are two mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, and one viral vector vaccine developed by AstraZeneca.
    from the IV. COVID-19 Experimental Vaccines Controversies: section:
    Scientists have the same concerns for the experimental vaccines as for all drugs. Is the proposed treatment safe and is it effective.
    1. Brand New Technology.
    No vaccine based on messenger RNA has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials     until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies.
    2. Failure of Previous Coronavirus Vaccines.
    Despite trying for decades, scientists have never been able to create a successful coronavirus vaccine.     Whenever they think they have, the experimental coronavirus vaccine has failed and animals who got the experimental vaccine died.
    3. No Independently Published Animal Studies.
    Most other previous vaccines have performed and published results on animal studies prior to giving to humans. This is critical because deadly effects are often not seen until this step.
    4. Known Complications.
    *(refer to the whitepaper for a full list)
    5. Unknown Complications.
    *(refer to the whitepaper for a full list)
    6. Pharmaceuticals are Immune from All Liability.
    The same companies (and executives) that profit from this vaccine are immune from all liability.     In 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). It provides immunity from liability to all vaccine manufacturing companies. With COVID-19 experimental vaccine, AstraZeneca goes even further in acknowledging that this is an emergency situation and requested no liability from the EU.
    7. An Experimental Vaccine Is Not Safer Than a Very Low IFR.
    The IFR was always known to be very low for the young and healthy middle aged, and it has now been shown to be extraordinarily low. We are getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.
    In the Questions Regarding the Effectiveness of the COVID-19 Experimental Vaccines section we find:
    1. No Proof the Vaccine Stops Transmission of the Virus.
    The trial data on the vaccinations released so far has not addressed the issue of transmission of the virus. That is, the efficacy data is primarily based on symptoms, not on transmission.
    I invite the reader to have a look at the entirety of the paper to get a full balanced perspective on these doctors’ professional assessment.
    4. The WHO’s statement (about the Covid-19 vaccine)

    As per a January 3, 2021 article entitled WHO, Fauci Warn COVID-19 Vaccines May Not Prevent Infection and Disease Transmission, even the WHO chief scientist warns that the Covid-19 may not prevent infection and disease transmission
    At a virtual press conference held by the World Health Organization (WHO) on Dec. 28, 2020, WHO officials warned there is no guarantee that COVID-19 vaccines will prevent people from being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and transmitting it to other people.
    One has to immediately ask: then what exactly is the purpose of the Covid-19 vaccine?
    It seems that all we have been hearing from governments and health authorities for the past year is the need to prevent further spreading of the virus. Although many [questionable and harsh] measures have been taken for this, they have all been aggressively pushing for a vaccine that would serve as an ultimate backstop.
    Yet, if these Covid-19 vaccines neither prevent the infection nor stop the spread of the disease, then what function are they serving (apart from big profits – in the $billions – for Big Pharma)?
    Any inquisitive mind would be asking this critical question.
    Here are some links to some articles about this should you wish to read more:
    From a now deleted Tweet (video still viewable):

    Source:
    5. Relevant Articles documenting Adverse Reactions & Deaths

    Once again, while there are so many instances of articles that have documented the countless cases of adverse effects and deaths – particularly among seniors and in nursing homes – here are some to give you a [bitter] taste of the sheer ugliness of what these toxic injections are providing to an all-too-trusting and vulnerable public. In each, you can read about the relevant details and specific adverse reactions and circumstances surrounding such instances. On occasion, I will include some excerpts/quotes from the original articles.
    “I’m choosing the risk — the risk of having COVID, or the risk of the unknown of the vaccine,” said 31-year-old nurse April Lu of the Providence Holy Cross Medical Center in Los Angeles, who added that she refused to take the vaccine because she wasn’t convinced of its safety for pregnant woman. Lu is six months pregnant.
    “I think I’m choosing the risk of COVID. I can control that and prevent it a little by wearing masks, although not 100% for sure,” she added. Lu isn’t alone, with several of her co-workers similarly refusing to take the vaccine.
    Another healthcare worker, office assistant Nicholas Ruiz at Natividad Medical Center in Salinas, California says that while he interacts with nurses who deal with COVID-19 patients, he’s not taking the vaccine either.
    Read the rest of the report here.
    The comments were made by WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan during what appears to have been a virtual press conference held Monday:
    “I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on”, says WHO Chief Scientist
    Of course, a close look at the research released by Pfizer and Moderna shows the studies haven’t actually tested whether the vaccines actually prevent transmission of the virus; the goal of the trials was to see whether vaccinated patients presented with COVID symptoms at a rate that was substantially less frequent than individuals who hadn’t been vaccinated.
    Ontario’s Chief Medical Officer says that those who refuse to take the COVID vaccine won’t have “freedom to move around” and will have to continue to wear masks.

    Dr. David Williams was asked if he “would make some sort of mandatory vaccination recommendation.”
    Williams acknowledged that “we can’t force someone to take a vaccine,” but when on to explain how people who didn’t take it would have their freedom of mobility severely restricted. “What we can do is to say sometimes for access or ease of getting into certain settings, if you don’t have vaccination then you’re not allowed into that setting without other protection materials,” said Williams.
    “What may be mandatory is proof of…vaccination in order to have latitude and freedom to move around…without wearing other types of personal protective equipment,” he added.
    If bars, restaurants, cinemas, sports venues, airlines, employers and others all make the vaccination a mandatory condition of service, anyone who refuses to take it will be reduced to a personal form of de facto lockdown with their social lives and mobility completely stunted.
    In a previous post from six months ago, I expressed concern about what the Canadian government were planning with regards to a potential mandatory vaccination program following the Pfizer and Moderna’s contract with them in this regard. In that piece, I reference a CCTV article ‘Feds strike deal with pharmaceutical firms for millions of doses of COVID-19 vaccine’ for which I highlighted the following:
    …in which was stated by Canadian Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains the following troubling words:
    “Until we immunize all Canadians, we must also focus on producing treatments for those who contract the virus,”
    Both Bains and Anand said they will be working closely with Health Minister Patty Hajdu and Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam on a vaccine rollout plan, which will include decision-making on whether to make vaccination mandatory or voluntary. [a reference to what Minister Bains said along with Mrs. Anand, the Minister of Public Services and Procurement].
    To say that Canadian health authorities are considering making these dangerous Covid-19 vaccines upon 33 million Canadians is not only careless, but worrisome to say the least.
    Why should we ask 99.7% of Americans or the world to accept medical tyranny just to make .26% of the population feel safe?
    The vaccine rush and the claims of effectiveness of 94% to 95% from Pfizer and Moderna are suspect.     The average effectiveness of most vaccines is around 50% or less, and these are vaccines with hundreds of trials and years of usage. Somehow, Pfizer and Moderna were both able to produce a vaccine for a SARS type virus when multiple governments tried for over a decade to produce vaccines for SARS in China and were unsuccessful, and they were able to achieve 95% effectiveness?
    The elites know that a third of Americans (and probably Europeans) will not take the vaccine regardless of any propaganda they dish out. They also know that 60% of Americans are unlikely to take the vaccine unless they can show an effectiveness rate of at least 75%. Neither Moderna nor Pfizer have actually produced any evidence that their vaccines are capable of prevented severe illness or death from Covid, so, their effectiveness rate is based on “projections” of success according to their minimal trials. Meaning, the effectiveness rate of 95% is completely arbitrary.
    The public is right to be suspicious. A former Pfizer vice president, Dr. Michael Yeadon among other medical professionals have recently warned that the vaccines have not been adequately tested and that there is a risk of “indefinite infertility” for women who take the current Covid vaccine due to damaging autoimmune response. In other words, the vaccine could make many women barren and unable to have children.
    As you can see in the passage above, even a former Pfizer vice-president has warned that these vaccines have not been adequately tested and pose a risk of infertility for women.

    Image source
    Finally, it must also be noted that these pharmaceutical companies enjoy immunity from legal prosecution and financial damages resulting from the ill-effects and deaths of those (or the family members of those) who have suffered from their vaccines. This is the case in the United States, as I have documented in my post on Big Pharma; excerpt follows:
    Vaccine Makers Enjoy Total Immunity from Prosecution in the United States

    Source: Cornell Law 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22. Standards of responsibility
    With the complicit assistance of a very corrupt US Congress, Big Pharma enjoys total immunity from prosecution since the passing of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act which completely shields them from liability when their vaccines cause injury or death of innocent babies and children – the most vulnerable members of society.
    While I don’t have the complete information handy, it is my understanding that many of the G20 countries have offered similar immunity from prosecution to these pharmaceutical giants with regards to the Covid-19 as well, as I have read several pieces to this effect (but unfortunately cannot currently locate them); feel free to refute this in the comments section below if you have information that confirms the contrary.
    6. How to protect yourself against unwanted forced vaccines

    As various governments and health authorities keep pushing the illusion that Covid-19 vaccines are safe and that everyone should get them, and, while the mainstream media outlets refuse to do any real investigative or objective reporting on the matter, we, as people who are rightfully concerned with our health, should take our own precautions with regards to this virus.
    Moreover, we need to keep an eye on our respective legislators to see if they are being aggressively lobbied by large pharmaceutical firms who are pushing for the sale and administration of hundreds of millions of doses of their experimental, obviously dangerous and unproven Covid-19 vaccines.
    You are protected against unwanted vaccination under the law

    As I succinctly outlined in a previous post about Covid-19 Vaccination Status Passports, legally, no country nor its health authorities has any legal right to force-vaccinate us. Specifically in that article, I stated the following:
    Here’s where the law is on your side though:
    The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights from the United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (URL: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx) clearly states in Article 7:

    International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 23 March 1976, in accordance with Article 49, source: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx
    Article 7
    No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
    As no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation, this clearly outlines your rights not to be forced to take a vaccination – certainly not an experimental one which many from Pfizer, Moderna, and others actually are – against your will.
    And any person or entity enforcing this upon you would be in direct violation of this legal right     and could thus be subject to legal action and possibly prosecuted.
    If you want to make sure that your country adheres to this covenant by the United Nations, you can consult the official list of 173 countries that have legalized this covenant in their own legislatures. (See Wikipedia – International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – Parties to the Covenant, URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter..._and_Political_Rights#Parties_to_the_Covenant)
    Even though we are legally protected under the law, sadly some governments and health authorities – particularly those ill-informed and subservient idiots who enforce their rules and illegal mandates – may still try to impose their medical tyranny upon the sanctity of your body and sovereignty.
    In such cases, you still have another means by which you can, at least partially, protect yourself.
    Notice of Liability

    That is to say, by means of making any person or authority who is wishing to impose an unwanted vaccine on you (or outright trying to coerce you into a forced-vaccination) to sign a ‘Notice of Liability’.
    This ‘Notice of Liability’ document basically states your reluctance to take the jab and any negative consequences arising from it will be subject to legal prosecution towards the party who has given it to you.
    In my post, I also added a section Draft yourself a ‘Notice of Liability’ (for your added protection) where I included the following:
    If you feel that you will trapped into a situation were some “authoritative” figure or entity will seek to impose a vaccine or unwanted medical procedure on you (or your children), you can always create form called Notice of Liability.
    You can search the net for some templates but the general idea here is to write a formal single page document that would contain the following:
    • Title Notice of Liability, or Notice of Medical Liability
    • A space to inscribe the date
    • Your full name and date of birth
    • An underlined section at the bottom of the form (where the person who is wishing to administer the vaccine on you will both PRINT their name and also sign it). The name of the organization this person represents can also be inscribed there if desired.
    • Text to the following effect:
    • “I must state that I have legitimate concerns regarding the safety risks associated with this vaccine and am not comfortable in receiving it.”
    • “I will consent to taking your vaccine if you can prove to me that it is safe and effective and it hasn’t harmed anyone so far.”
    • “I will only consent to receive this vaccine if you agree to accept the liability associated with it by signing this form and commit to accept full responsibility should any medical, clinical, bodily, mental, physiological, psychological, or emotional harm results from its administration into my body.
    • You agree to be held personally and financially (including related financial costs such as hospitalization, medical treatment, and required medications) responsible for any damages incurred to me as a result of the administration of this vaccine.
    You can also request that they provide you with the vaccine manufacturer’s insert for the particular vaccine they want to administer on you; and ask for their guarantee that you will not suffer from any of the side-effects or contraindications found therein.
    I also recently found a great online resource – Covileaks (from the UK) that has many templates for such kinds of notices of liability.
    These templates are not limited to vaccines. Many parents are concerned about the continued use of masks (as this can cause other health problems); and so, there are templates of notices of liability that can be served to school principals and administrators should parents choose to express their concerns.
    The use of these kinds of notices of liability can serve as an effective deterrent and means by which you can remind those who wish to unlawfully and egregiously impose their will on you that there can be very serious legal and financial consequences arising from unwanted outcomes related to whatever nonsense they are trying to impose on you.
    Vaccine Choice Canada     also has a Covid-19 page that outlines various resources on the subject. A link to a petition (stopmedicaldiscrimination.org) that had garnered 384,824 signatures to ‘STOP MEDICAL DISCRIMINATION, The Petition To Stop Forced Experimental Vaccines’ was active but no longer appears on the web apart from its archived version)
    Finally, it is also very worthy of mention that Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy is a global phenomenon, as can be attested by the following survey results from WORLD VACCINE POLLS(https://www.worldvaccinepoll.com/):


    Source: WORLD VACCINEPOLLS (https://www.worldvaccinepoll.com/)
    As you can see from the survey results above, a whopping 94.31% of respondents are opposed to mandatory vaccinations and over 90% stated they would not be taking the jab.
    7. Conclusion

    Shame on the governments and health authorities/agencies of Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and elsewhere for participating in what amounts to assault, medical negligence, and medical tyranny.
    While some in these positions may hold honoroable or noble intentions, the fact remains that they have grossly breached in their duties to protect the sanctity of the health of their constituents.
    They have incompetently chosen to blindfully serve the medical oligarchy rather than those they are suppose to.
    It is high time that the masses start to inform themselves properly and take action, for if they don’t they will find themselves on the receiving end of undesirable adverse effects, or even death.
    God bless you all.
    In Peace & Liberty,
    @libertyacademy

    LEARN MORE

    Read LaterAdd to FavouritesAdd to CollectionReport

    The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.
    WHAT DO YOU THINK?
    Likes Created with Sketch. 4  Upvote
    Stroke 3 Created with Sketch. Comments Created with Sketch. Reply
 

Featured News

ARU More, more, more: Arafura eyes another US$300M in funding for flagship
right-arrow Created with Sketch.
STN Saturn yields 88% gold recoveries without milling at WA's Apollo Hill
right-arrow Created with Sketch.
SS1 Sun Silver books specialty firm to enhance US solar panel silver paste grant
right-arrow Created with Sketch.
LU7 Lithium Universe unveils procurement strategy for Becancour refinery
right-arrow Created with Sketch.
I88 Infini flags evidence of uranium on-site Portland Creek project to wrap up maiden run
right-arrow Created with Sketch.
AUQ Alara Resources becomes the ASX's latest copper producer – right in the midst of a rally
right-arrow Created with Sketch.

Top Stories

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.