"Currently to ban with no evidence can suggust that he what...

"Currently to ban with no evidence can suggust that he what banned because he was critical of this particular company and that in itself down grades the whole discussion."

BULL!

Never seen HC ban a poster because of their views on any particular stock. HC do go through a technical process to determine if 2 posters are posting from the same IP address and computer.

I for one invite opposing views but Frankland's postings where full of mis-information. I disagree Frankland was a good poster considering he refused to back-up his claims or so called facts with anything directly or indirectly related to GGG. When he was asked to clarify or prove his content, he failed to do so. Its clear this guy has a sinister agenda. If you post something, as per ASIC guidelines you need to back it up.

Now its evident he's a multi nick, doesn't surprise me!