I wonder where Mathieson launched his scathing attack, or did the reporters ring him up and ask questions to create a story.
Just strange if the only scathing attack was in the article about the scathing attack.
If the paper didn't give Mathieson a venue for the scathing attack, would there of been a scathing attack.
I don't see why Margie Abbott's actions would need to be defend by the article, she is not obliged in any way to live up to Mathieson version of what she should be doing.
It is her life and her choice of what she chooses to do or not do, nothing to do with Mathieson.
