The RC covered those items when Gillard was questioned, and ultimately nothing of any consequence was revealed.
I can only go by the information currently available.
Just because you want her to be guilty, doesn't make it so.
Suspicion, feelings, and only looking at one possible scenario of the events does not make her guilty.
If you have something that is beyond just a desire to assume guilt, then please share.
Gillard may very well be guilty of criminal activity, but just desire and feelings ain't going to cut it in determining guilt.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Gillard the liar
Gillard the liar, page-61
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online