"Oh, I mean, now that its out the newspapers will want to do the same - helps sell papers!"
Note "newspapers" and "papers"! So implied is more than one writer.
That's the first point.
Secondly, you say "......so based on your points you don't think that newspapers and journalists every {sic} write anything that doesn't seek headlines or perhaps favor the extreme to gain attention."
Yep they do. And I never said otherwise. But suggesting, as Victoria did in the post that by reporting on the IMF statement that it would be for the purpose of gaining readers or selling more papers, is nonsense.....with respect.
I would suggest to you for any media organization to ignore the story would be failing in their duty. It would be clearly in the public interest for us all to know what the IMF has to say about the global economy, agree or not.
I suspect, like so many others, Victoria and perhaps you has a vested interest in seeing such stories go unreported.
THE ABOVE IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE AND NOT DESIGNED TO BAIT, TROLL, FLAME, CREATE AN ARGUMENT OR OTHERWISE CAUSE OFFENCE TO ANY PERSON WHO SO-EVER IS ENTITLED TO DISAGREE WITH MY OPINION AS STATED IN THE ABOVE TEXT
