Global Exposure comparison.., page-17

Spitfire.

One only has to read your recent posting..
To feel the bitterness within..
Particularly when you keep wanting to take a dig at another company simply cos it is dual listed ??
And simply cos its getting on with its job

All of my very recent comments on MAY are completely justified..
In fact they completely align with your more recent sentiments..

I am not here to muscle my way into being a selfproclaimed MAY bulletin board/forum leader.. if that is causing anyone any angst..

MAY has so far not delivered on what it said it would in regards to cuba projects which were earmarked as the flagship projects..
They appear to have possibly cornered themselves..
Great buying opportunity if it gets resolved, and well worth a punt.
I sure hope they now farmout the cuba projects on reasonable terms.

Hopefully someone drilling a tight shale in another country which has serious conventional projects as 'backup', nor stock promoter websites who themselves use silly unrelated pictures of oldfashioned rigs when promoting other companies, will not create issues for the MAY board of directors nor management to actually deliver on cuba..

Might be a good idea if we ask MAY management, if the same team that did the NZ seismic interp, is behind the cuba project.. and if so.. could it all be doublechecked... just a thought..