Roberts is no spokesperson for me, I wouldn’t even claim that your suggestions that he is just a puppet parroting half arsed questions fed to him by vested interests are wrong, partially wrong or debatable.
The questions he put forward matter naught but the answers given by our respected scientific organisation in those 4 points support my views on this subject.
Surely you must have read plenty of my post were I state that we as a nation should support and encourage government policies/spending in research of cleaner greener energy production, supporting research into climate and weather predictions and even supporting private businesses in similar goals.
I’m just not a person who is as panicky as those who don’t doubt that the 4 horsemen are just below the skyline and coming at a fast clip.
What are the chances that conmen support the deniers? In my opinion About even with the probability of conmen supporting the believers.
Those 4 points don’t make either side 100% correct but they do render any claims of absolute proof for either side, laughable.
