"I often reject arguments supporting AGW because I believe data collected over a decade or two is insufficient to determine long term trends."
Yes I agree whole heartedly. But that's where the argument is unfortunately - the point I'm making is that even when you conduct the argument on their terms, using their data, there are massive holes in it.
AlphaCenturian
I'd love to stay and chat but its getting a bit chilly - gotta throw a few more tyres on the fire.
