Me? As one individual? Not much -requires a global approach.
But I don't pick and choose from science to suit my portfolio.
To refer to the previous "Ice Age", (assuming you weren't around then to know of its existence), you must have relied on the scientific world for your knowledge. (the consensus agreeing that last one was around 20k years ago) You accept that, and refer to it, but reject the consensus scientific opinion re global warming for reasons which are only known to yourself. (which I have assumed are centred around the stock you own).
You may well possess PhD's galore and have conducted extensive research in this area but your language doesn't seem to reflect that.
I just don't pick and choose from science what suits me. I make observations, but the reasoning/logic/knowledge/understanding I leave to those that have specialised in this field for tens of thousands of hours. (and possess a much higher IQ than I)
