Firstly Mr Birdman, you might think about the phrase I used in the very first sentence of my post. "...better scientists". Perhaps you skimmed over that bit.
Papers get rejected all the time by the peer review process and some scientists like the humans they are, get a bit miffed.
Here's a quote for you in case you want to go beyond what Mr Murdoch wants the world to know.
"A spokesman for the journal's publisher, IOP Publishing, told the Mail that Bengtsson's submission:
"... was peer-reviewed by two independent reviewers, who reported that the paper contained errors and did not provide a significant advancement in the field, and therefore failed to meet the journal's required acceptance criteria. As a consequence, the independent reviewers recommended that the paper should not be published in the journal which led to the final editorial decision to reject the paper.""
