which facts, the ones regarding rising temperatures, that every time they state them the skeptics claim they are wrong? or where they are refuted with the "tenuous or no link" argument?
how does one enter into intelligent debate in such a scenario. as i have maintained all along, scientific debate is all but useless, this is an argument that is absurd, it is a bunch of people on an evidently sinking ship bickering over whether the hole in the hull was manmade or just the result of normal weathering. and whether or not the lifeboats should be used as they are quite expensive to replace.
to which i am sure the response will once again be - where is the proof?
ho hum. wake me up if the water gets up to your knees, then i am sure we will be able to debate this to your satisfaction
