Clearly?
1) most of those named are project or engineering people with no atmospheric physics or relevant qualifications. Many are materials science related engineers. meteorologist (one named) in the US generally means weather presenter, not scientist. None of the roles on your list suggest these guys have any relevant expertise.
2) they are a handful of names with no relevant qualification or study, versus well established strong consensus science.
3) They actually put up no argument why the science is wrong.
So, yes, clearly.
But grasp any straw.
Again, read about atmospheric mixing. If you make a genuine effort you'll get it.
