global warming is the biggest fraud in history

Originally posted by mjp2 ↑

"The heatwave index is what the article claimed ..."

Oh the blinkers are strong with this one.

1. It's not an article. It's a US National Research Program Special Report on Climate Change, put together by NOAA, NASA, the US Army Corps of Engineers, multiple Universities, the Oak Ridge and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories, the Department of Energy Office of Science, the Naval Post Graduate School and other authors. It's from the fourth official US National Climate Assessment.

2. It does not solely make a "claim" regarding the heat wave index. It covered a rather large amount of scientific information on evidence of climate change from multiple areas of research. Unfortunately, well, typically, 99% of which you have ignored while you went off on your little quibble.

" ... and they are plainly wrong!"

3. Except that it's you who is wrong. The statement made in bellcurve's quote, one of only two sentences on heat waves in the 26 page executive summary, is "heatwaves have become more frequent in the United States since the 1960s". That is an entirely accurate statement, as your own chart shows.

Now, I agree with you that, in the context of the 1930's dust bowl heat waves, that that recent trend is not very significant. But that is also what the Special Report makes clear elsewhere in the Executive Summary. They don't however let that distract them from the overwhelming evidence of climate change overall.

---

So keep the blinkers on regarding the bigger picture. Keep finding small issues to quibble over. And keep claiming conspiracy theories about doctoring data etc by tens of thousands of international scientists from hundreds of institutions. It seems to be what you want to do, and over a decade of responding to the garbage you keep posting here it seems clear we aren't going to convince you otherwise. That's your problem, not ours.

Expand

Again the irony,

Blinkers.

I am NOT quoting anything else other than the reference to the Heatwave index and its claim that it has been rising since the 60s. This is used as some form of validation to infer CO2 responsible warming.

CLEARLY this is not the case as previous to the 60s the HEATWAVE index shat all over the current index.

Why you have insisted one has to look at the whole as a bundle package may suit your argument but reality is that is not a prerequisite if YOU want top feel the vibe as you do. It is your wonder world and I will leave you there.

I post up 100s of papers that refute the settled science. you troll through them. Look for one to have a flaw or at least from your perspective have a flaw and you use that to dis every other paper. yes the irony mjp