Hi Dertz, i am not sure where you are headed with this. I am familiar with firning and vostok. In fact it is because of firning and vostock i became a sceptic.
Anyway, i think we are in agreeance that vostock is at a minimum using a 1000 year moving average. I thought / think it is/was several thousand years. But 1000 years is plenty.. That 1000 year moving average number alone would indicate that 280ppm is not really the maximum that it peaked at ?
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Global Warming
Global Warming, page-254
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online