Is it not good science to display opposing ideas?
Why then have we not seen the publications that were NOT chosen for the 'body of evidence' of the IPCC.
Let's see it - and then, when we have some clarity and transparency - we can judge.
Otherwise - this isn't science, this is a con job ------------------ a great big snow job.
eos
Pinto
Global Warming, page-72
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 185 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)