As the IPCC`s alarmist predictions fail the raw data test the IPCC has begun redefining climate to very vague terms hard to disprove.
It also admits that it can`t be certain that any warming is caused by human activity.
So much for the" settled science" claimed by its Greenpeace researchers behind its alarmist predictions of 1990.
Even formerly avid warmists like Santer are puzzled why their predictions haven`t materialized.
The warmist trough of money is not slopping over the edges any longer unfortunately for Flannery, Steffens Mann and others.
"Climate models have long overstated the supposed rise in air temperature. Recently, even alarmist scientists like Ben Santer have agreed that a warming hiatus has kept air temperatures unchanged for over 15 years, even as plant-fertilizing carbon dioxide levels in Earth’s atmosphere rose to 400 parts per million.
No trends exist in tropical cyclones, tornadoes, floods, droughts or other weather extremes. Contentions that these changes will pose health risks and threaten our economy are purely scare tactics. Climate has always changed and weather is always variable, due to complex, powerful natural forces. Insisting that these events must be caused or exacerbated by human activity reflects a denial of basic climate science.
Full adherence to the Paris Treaty by all nations would prevent an undetectable 0.3°F (0.2°C) rise by 2100 – assuming that all climate change is driven by humans and not by natural forces. This meaningless achievement, by switching to 100% renewable energy, would cost $12.7 trillion to $93 trillion by 2030."
from Paul Driessen "Green Power - Black Death"
