the gearing in GMG is less than 40% whilst IIF is near to 55%. The GMG portfolio has better quality than IIF which is mostly industrial. GMG has a geographical robust diversification, whilst IIF is concentrated in Canada, Australia & some countries in Europe. Good thing about IIF is ING on their name, but that doesn't guarantee anything. Analysis on NTA should be done only if companies are liquidating, which is not the case. GMG should be trading over the NTA given the management and non-tangible assets. Not the case with IIF.
IMO both are good shots in the long term because, as karasko just said, the world will keep turning.
gmg vs iif, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add GMG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$36.32 |
Change
-0.780(2.10%) |
Mkt cap ! $68.75B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $36.67 | $36.95 | $35.96 | $50.11M | 1.381M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 74155 | $38.52 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $33.93 | 934 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.59pm 22/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| GMG (ASX) Chart |