SP, I guess we are coming from different angles though I understand and respect your comments. Biting off more than you can chew can sometimes be the undoing? I suspect, reading between the lines, CQT realised the prevailing and existing resource constraints in the face of developing a potentially huge resource.
If CQT owned 25% of the new ground yet to be explored and 50% of the existing ie MtCarlton/Silver Hill and a half a billion in the bank after GF exercised its option , you could argue from an investor perspective ie looking for a return, that a very substantial capital return could be in the offering down the track.
SP, you are more the purist, looking at the opportunity from a very pragmatic perspective. My take on the deal focuses more on the commercial and logistical risks going forward, albeit in the form of a reduced piece of the action.
So yes, certainly a smaller piece of the pie but the unknown at this stage is that noone really knows just how big that pie is?
I have learned much from your posts, thanks.
The very best of luck to you SP.
ciao
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CQT
- gold fields signs jv with conquest...
gold fields signs jv with conquest..., page-45
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CQT (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online