I'm curious... why would a company decide that is commercially viable to go back into a site that has already been mined years ago. wouldn't the asset in the ground have been extracted? I guess what I'm trying to say is why would a company like this think that they can do a better job than the previous miners in the same site? In my simple mind I guess it's like trying to wonder why your company might decide to go back to a place like Hill End to search for gold.. 100 years after the site was fully extracted. i'm sure I'm missing something obvious but I'd appreciate your thoughts on this..
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CRL
- Gold multibagger of 2021
Gold multibagger of 2021, page-106
- There are more pages in this discussion • 152 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)