So what you're saying as small SH's we should just sit here and...

So what you're saying as small SH's we should just sit here and get ****ed by the big guys? That we have no say? Well I'm determined to have a say and regardless of the result; I will be voting NO. A testament to fight against those who think that it's okay to just let the rich have their way with us. Does it matter? Probably not but I'll know I did my part in this David vs Goliathe battle. Were you consulted with whether this merger was good for the companies or not? If not well maybe should have consulted us too if they wanted our vote. At the end of the day "WHY BUY RED AT .43 WHEN SLR IS TRADING AT THE EQUIVALENT OF .419? SLR IS BIGGER AND BETTER AND CHEAPER. SLR P/E 14.47 TO RED5 PE 29.51 WHY PAY MORE FOR LESS. WHO WOULD BUY RED WHEN YOU CAN BUY SLR INSTEAD? I SOLD MY RED TO BUY SLR. IF THE MERGER DOESN'T GO THROUGH THEN YOU HOLD A BETTER COMPANY WITH LOWER PE EVAULATIONS BETTER HEDGES AND MORE CASH ON HAND. IF IT DOES GO THROUGH THEN IT WAS CHEAPER TO BUY SLR THAN RED. WHO WOULD EVEN BUY RED RIGHT NOW?"

ALSO:
VOTE NO TO INFLATED PE EVAULATIONS. VOTE NO TO UNDERPRICED HEDGES. VOTE NO TO LT GETTING KICKBACKS FOR LETTING THIS FARCE OF A MERGER GO THROUGH. VOTE NO TO DESTROYING SHAREHOLDER WEALTH. VOTE NO TO SHARE DILUTION. VOTE NO TO DEADWEIGHT. VOTE NO SO SLR CAN RERATE. VOTE NO SO SLR CAN PAY DIVIDENDS. VOTE NO POG GO HIGHER DEAL GET WORSE FOR SLR. VOTE NO TO GOING INTO THE RED. Anyone got some facts to debate why this is untrue other than your opinions? also keep it short I don't want to read no esse's