the half yearly shows $5m accumulated expenditure in NT. Let's assume only $3m of this is re Iron Blow and Mount Bonnie up until 31 December 2016. Let's assume another $1m get sunk in concluding the pfs.
If I follow the Kirkland agreement logic, if it's a good PFS outcome (which the recent announcements sort of point to), then does that mean Kirkland pays pnx 3 * $4m=$12m and pnx retains 70% of the project?
If so, then pnx would be worth at least a little more than it's current $12m market cap ... using a bit of arithmetic wouldn't it be closer to $12m/0.3 = $40m on delivery of a sound PFS?
just curious
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PNX
- Gold, silver, zinc, copper, lead !
Gold, silver, zinc, copper, lead !, page-27
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PNX (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $23.88M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
PNX (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable