Again for your benefit, your quote:
"Oddly, in a 2022 audit, the numbers didn't match."
Where in the audit report, which you cited, is this stated?
The cash at bank was an equivocation, rather than a diversion. I am still on the topic of gold reserves.
Ok if I grant that numbers were changed, what is the assertion from that point? The same amount of gold, of the same quality was found in the same location with the numbers accepted by the RBA to account for their original deposit. No issue.
What exactly is your issue with changing from one number to another, given all other things are the same, as found in the audit. What is the current detriment to those holdings?
Again for your benefit, your quote:"Oddly, in a 2022 audit, the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)