Matter of interest, how do they calculate that when the componants of the Dow are not the same as 1913 or the capital losses as a result of components crashing out to nothing?
Kodak sears etc?
Also wondering- I hear the arguements about income paying- but how is this calculated?
Many home Owners have lost it all during bust times since 1913,
Rent income is that gross estimated? what about the rise in holding costs - I know quite a few in property that sold up and haven’t really made much after a decade or more after decducting stamp duties- non payment of rents- insurance- council fees- high income earner levies- ocassional levies like vendor tax- agent fees - regulation
As for farmland - that income is obviously not constant- certainly in oz there are plenty of capital losses from investments in farming since 1913- and many of this investments have high interest which the income
Doesn’t always cover- hence its is subsidised and supported —
I’m not convinced - whilst on the face of it- those sort of comparisons present to true pictures - the quick comparisons available do not imo tell 100 percent the story of changed components and assume constant positive income and no capital losses
I accept the graphs on the face of it are correct but the information to make the graph imo are strongly misrepresenting the true underlying complexity and are far too simplistic
- Forums
- Commodities
- GOLD
- gold
gold, page-48450
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 79,277 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)