You, ummm, do realise that if indeed stock markets "look to the future" then your analysis as to how much stocks go up for each President becomes invalid don't you?
At any rate you said "economy and private sector growth" not share prices but for some bizarre reason your "evidence" (which you deem to be very important) consisted only of an entirely irrelevant metric to your thesis.
There is virtually zero link between real wealth and share market performance. Just ask the people of Zimbabwe.
And it's worth noting you quietly changed your thesis from "government" to "President" when your error was pointed out but you still tried to claim you were right.
