Here we go again-can't you lift your game just a bit ?
So now you outright dispute the history and facts in the reference I provided to you yet in your typical fashion fail to offer any argument, evidence, substantiation or support for your position other than to reference some MSM article containing one opinion and perspective which unconvincingly supports your position and evidences your very own stooging round MSM sites looking for an answer which suits you and which you accuse others of ! I mean really !!.
Let's see you counter the individual events and circumstances detailed in the article I referenced.
There's plenty of 'MSM' sites (as you describe them) and other more reputable sites providing the same history and detail outlined in the initial reference I provided but I can understand how reluctant you would be to do that or even acknowledge it as we all know just how breathtakingly narrow your view of the world clearly is.
