goldilocks99, page-10

In defense of Goldilocks, I always find her posts well constructed and informative. You may not agree with her analysis but you have to accept there is a depth to it that is lacking in 95% of HC posts. She doesn't just post peurile nonesense but attempts to analyse what is going on with a company. I wish she would post more often and on more companies.
Finally I think that the fact that she changes her opinion about the potential of a stock indicates that she it not ruled by irrational attachment to a company. I like what she posted on RMI but she was the first to point out that their resource estimate was lower than expected and thus devalued the company. Take a look at the MXR posts in recent days to see some irrational exuberance over a less than stella JORC.