IMO:
To clarify, an estimated $2.7M for GV versus what CLZ would benefit would not make this funding arrangement tenable.
There's a high risk in: gold price, factors in production, logistics, resource quality and quality ( inferred only ) and especially in management skills ( lack of for CLZ in producing ).
Margin (net profit) based on averaged sample of nine existing gold mining companies.
Can anyone come up with credible figures that will convince otherwise?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?