MeekatShare your opinions for sure. A thread should not be...

Meekat

Share your opinions for sure. A thread should not be biased. However back up your assertions with some facts.
Claiming Hunt did a CSEM is just plain stupid and shows total ignorance.
If you want to bleat on about the negatives then come up with something factual and something you can substantiate.

As for it being a casino stock???

Where can you bet the odds in your favour in the casino.
Those that would have rather waited for the drill are simply crazy.
It isn't a matter of opinion which is the better outcome unless you were planning on selling prior to drill. If that was the case then bad luck. A lot worse could have happened. Like no major partner at all. No funds for the drill and loss of the rights over the area. Yet some of you would have preferred that risk as opposed to Shell punting in with 3.5m plus funding everything up to either taking up the option or not, doing the CSEM which will prove up positively the hydrocarbons.
Shell are doing this because they are simply gamblers?
Or do you think they saw something in the 3d seimic that gives them reason to progress?

Now as for some odds...

If Shell don't take up the option then what sort of price?

Ok...lets say half

If Shell say yep we are in...what sort of price?

Go get them odds at your casino

lmao

Just one question you may like to ask yourselves before you post next.

Am I thinking about what is best for the company or what is best for me as an individual?

I think we know the answer to most of us.

Some want to ride along on the companies success

Some simply want to profit and couldn't care less whether it is at the companies expense or not.

Michael Evans owes a responsibility to the company of shareholders and not the individual greed of some.